FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
ACE Issue Brief on the Respecting the First Amendment on Campus Act (Apr. 18, 2024)
Issue Brief from the American Council on Education (ACE) on the Respecting the First Amendment on Campus Act. The brief identifies key concerns with the “Respecting the First Amendment on Campus Act” (H.R. 7683) introduced on March 5, 2024. Those concerns include increased litigation resulting from the Act’s proposed private right of action and waiver of public institutions’ sovereign immunity rights based on receipt of Title IV funding; the potential loss of Title IV aid resulting from noncompliance with even minor reporting or disclosure requirements; administrative and safety concerns related to the designation of all publicly accessible areas at public institutions as “traditional public forums;” safety concerns related to proposed limits to assess security fees for campus events involving controversial speakers; a prohibition on “all-comers” policies for religious student organizations; constraints on recruitment and academic pursuits entailed in the proposed prohibition on “political litmus tests;” and potential equal protection and Title IX concerns related to the proposed prohibition on actions to “limit or deny” students’ ability to form or participate in single-sex social organizations. ACE also released a Bill Summary detailing the Act’s provisions.
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | First Amendment & Free SpeechDate:
Settlement Agreement between DOJ and The Washington Univ. (Apr. 16, 2024)
Settlement Agreement between the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Immigrant and Employee Rights (IER) Section and The Washington University. The Agreement resolves IER’s investigation of its reasonable cause belief that individuals at The Washington University School of Medicine allegedly discriminated against an individual granted asylum status by questioning him about his immigration status, work authorization documentation, and right to work after he had satisfied Form I-9 requirements, and then retaliated against him by terminating his employment after he complained of the treatment. The Agreement, which is effective for two years, provides that the University will pay civil penalties and backpay to the complainant, revise its employment policies, train all I-9 personnel on unfair immigration-related employment practices, and be subject to reporting and monitoring for the term of the agreement.
Topics:
Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & StaffDate:
EEOC Final Rule on Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (Apr. 19, 2024)
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Final Rule and Interpretive Guidance on Implementation of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). The regulations provide for the implementation by the EEOC of the PWFA’s requirements that covered entities “provide reasonable accommodations to a qualified employee’s or applicant’s known limitations related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause an undue hardship to the operation of the business of the covered entity.” The publication contains interpretive guidance, including many examples illustrating situations under major provisions of the PWFA, that will also guide the agency in its enforcement of the PWFA. The Final Rule and interpretive guidance will become effective on June 18, 2024.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Pregnancy Discrimination | Sex DiscriminationDate:
U.S. Dep’t of Education Final Rule on Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance (Apr. 19, 2024)
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Final Rule on Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance. Among other purposes, the Department issued these regulations “to provide greater clarity regarding the definition of ‘sex-based harassment;’ the scope of sex discrimination, including recipients’ obligations not to discriminate based on sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity; and recipients’ obligations to provide an educational environment free from discrimination on the basis of sex.” The Department also issued a Fact Sheet, Summary of Major Provisions, and Resource for Drafting Nondiscrimination Policies, Notices of Nondiscrimination, and Grievance Procedures. The Final Rule is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on April 29, 2024, and becomes effective August 1, 2024.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Employee Sexual Misconduct | Sex Discrimination | Students | Title IX & Student Sexual MisconductDate:
Corrigan v. Bos. Univ. (1st Cir. Apr. 12, 2024)
Opinion affirming dismissal. Plaintiff, a former graduate student at Boston University, brought a disability discrimination claim against the University after she was suspended in Fall 2021 for noncompliance with the University’s mandatory COVID-19 testing protocol, which was supported by the University’s establishment of an on-campus PCR testing laboratory. Plaintiff asserted that she should be exempted due to a chronic medical condition. In October 2022, the District Court dismissed her claim as moot because the University had ended its mandatory testing program due to the then-decline of the pandemic. In affirming dismissal, the First Circuit found that there was little likelihood that the challenged conduct would repeat itself, noting no clear error in the findings that (1) the University had dismantled the infrastructure of its testing program, (2) the University ended its testing program voluntarily and was unlikely to start a similar program that would affect the plaintiff, and (3) there was no imminent and substantial risk that the alleged harm was capable of repetition.
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | Coronavirus | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab. (D. Md. Apr. 11, 2024)
Memorandum Opinion granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, a former engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), brought failure to accommodate, employment discrimination, and prohibited examination and inquiry claims against APL after it terminated her for noncompliance with its COVID-19 vaccination and testing requirements. Plaintiff requested an exemption to the vaccination requirement, asserting an “immune dysregulation” and “excessive immune activation” related to “years of chronic Lyme Disease,” and to the testing requirement, asserting that the requirement was unreasonable. She refused repeated requests to provide recent medical documentation or to sign a medical release form to enable APL’s medical officer to consult with her medical provider. In granting summary judgment in APL’s favor on her failure to accommodate claim, the court found that it was plaintiff who refused to engage in an interactive process to find a reasonable accommodation. It also found that her termination was due to her refusal to comply with APL’s vaccination policy rather than discrimination based on her asserted disability. Finally, it dismissed her examination or inquiry claim, finding that APL’s inquiry related only to plaintiff’s request for a medical accommodation.
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | Coronavirus | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
Settlement Agreement between Speech First, Inc. and Okla. State Univ. (Apr. 15, 2024)
Settlement Agreement between Speech First, Inc. and Oklahoma State University. Speech First, a nationwide free speech watchdog group, sued Oklahoma State University alleging that the University’s harassment policy, computer use policy (with respect to transmission of political campaign messages), and the University’s Bias Incident Response Team chilled protected speech. Through the Agreement, the University agreed to maintain changes it had made to its harassment and computer use policies and to disband its Bias Incident Response Team. The Agreement also provides that Speech First will not challenge the University’s definition of sexual harassment in its Title IX policy so long as it mirrors “the governing definition promulgated by the United States Department of Education via notice-and-comment rulemaking under Title IX or the Violence Against Women Act.”
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | First Amendment & Free Speech
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.