FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Department of Education Dear Colleague Letter on Updated Requirements for Distribution of Voter Registration Forms and Federal Work Study Allowable Uses of Funds (Aug. 19, 2025)
The Department of Education (the Department) issued a Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) detailing updated requirements for distribution of voter registration forms and allowable uses of federal work study (FWS) funds. The DCL states that the Department’s regulations prohibit FWS funds from being used to employ students whose work involves any partisan or nonpartisan political activity. The letter explains that “jobs involving partisan or nonpartisan voter registration, voter assistance at a polling place or through a voter hotline, or serving as a poll worker—whether this takes place on or off campus—involve political activity.” While past guidance from the Department expanded the allowable uses of FWS funds related to voter registration, the Department has now rescinded that guidance and encourages institutions to employ students in jobs that align with real-world work experience related to a student’s course of study. The DCL further states that institutions who distribute voter registration forms are encouraged to consider reminding students of the eligibility requirements to register to vote and cast ballots, and are encouraged to “remain mindful of their existing obligations under the law to avoid aiding and abetting voter fraud, such as actions to aid and abet a noncitizen to vote in a federal election.”
Topics:
Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students | Tax Implication of Campus Political Activity | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Loecker v. Bd. of Trustees for Colo. Mesa Univ. (D. Colo. May 1, 2023)
Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Strike and Exclude. Plaintiff, the former head coach of women’s lacrosse at Colorado Mesa University, brought sex discrimination claims against the University after she was terminated following complaints from players and parents that she “created a negative culture.” Plaintiff disclosed as an expert witness a professor of sports management whose report discussed gender bias, stereotypes, and leadership expectations in sports, and how these may affect evaluations of female coaches. The court first held that the testimony is admissible under Rule 702 on expert testimony, even though the expert’s report addressed only general principles, rather than the facts of the instant case. However, the court granted the University’s Motion to Strike and Exclude under Rule 403 on relevance, finding that this was a topic within a layperson’s common knowledge and that “its minimal probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”
Topics:
Athletics & Sports | Athletics Operations | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Sex Discrimination | Sex Discrimination in Employment | Tax Implication of Campus Political Activity | Taxes & Finances
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.