FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Department of Education Announces Additional Partnerships with Federal Agencies (Feb. 23, 2026)
The Department of Education (ED) announced two new interagency agreements (IAA) with the Department of State (State) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). State will partner with ED on the Section 117 foreign gifts reporting and HHS will partner with ED on family engagement and school support programs. A fact sheet on the partnership with State can be found here. A fact sheet on the partnership with HHS can be found here.
Topics:
Endowments & Gifts | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Blythe v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (D. Nev. Feb. 20, 2026)
Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff, a Division I baseball recruit for the University of Nevada, Reno, challenged the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) Five-Year Rule and sought a preliminary injunction barring enforcement after his hardship waiver was denied and he was declared ineligible based on his prior seasons playing baseball at Division II and NAIA institutions. The court held that plaintiff was likely to succeed on the merits of his Sherman Act claim, finding that the rule was commercial in nature and produced substantial anticompetitive effects, as well as finding the NCAA’s procompetitive rationales for the rule were insufficient. The court reasoned that the Five-Year Rule “forecloses the opportunity for qualified student-athletes from non-NCAA schools from entering a labor market for Division I baseball . . . simply because of their non-NCAA status.” While the court concluded that plaintiff faced immediate and irreparable harm “due to the time-sensitive loss of season play, compensation and related opportunity,” the NCAA “[would] not.” Accordingly, the court granted the preliminary injunction and enjoined enforcement of the Five-Year Rule against the plaintiff.
Topics:
Antitrust | Athletics & Sports | Athletics Compliance & NCAA Rules | Student Athlete Issues | Students | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Department of Education Releases Latest Foreign Funding Disclosures (Feb. 11, 2026)
The Department of Education released new data on its updated foreign gift reporting portal. For 2025, universities reported more than 8,300 foreign gifts and contracts totaling more than $5.2 billion. The disclosures identify Qatar (over $1.1 billion), the United Kingdom (over $633 million), China (over $528 million), Switzerland (over $451 million), Japan (over $374 million), Germany (over $292 million), and Saudi Arabia (over $285 million) as the largest foreign sources of reportable gifts and contracts to American universities. The Department’s new portal is designed to make information more readily accessible to the public and provides aggregate foreign funding totals dating back to 1986, although these totals are not disaggregated by year.
Topics:
Endowments & Gifts | International Ventures | Research | Taxes & FinancesDate:
IRS FAQ on New Deduction for Qualified Overtime Compensation under OBBB (Jan. 23, 2026)
The Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) related to the new deduction for qualified overtime compensation under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act. The FAQ provides clarification on eligibility requirements for deductions as well as supplemental information on eligibility and other rules.
Topics:
Compensation & Benefits | Taxes & FinancesDate:
IRS FAQ on New Deduction for Qualified Overtime Compensation under OBBB (Jan. 23, 2026)
The Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) related to the new deduction for qualified overtime compensation under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act. The FAQ provides clarification on eligibility requirements for deductions as well as supplemental information on eligibility and other rules.
Topics:
Compensation & Benefits | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Corzo v. Brown Univ. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 2026)
Opinion and Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, a putative class of alumni from 17 selective universities, sued the universities for violating section 1 of the Sherman Act, alleging that the schools colluded through the “568 Presidents Group” to standardize financial-aid calculations in ways that reduced competition and raised prices for students receiving aid. The court held that plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude there was an antitrust violation, finding (1) the universities “agreed on the Consensus Approach to avoid bidding wars and then adhered to it”; (2) the universities held “high enough market shares to infer market power”; and (3) plaintiffs had “suffered an injury when they paid too much.” The court rejected the universities’ section 568 antitrust exemption defense, reasoning that the defense did not apply because some of the universities in the Presidents Group were not admitting students on a “need blind” basis. While several universities maintained that they were still need blind, the court rejected this argument as unpersuasive and contrary to the statutory text, finding that plaintiffs had demonstrated their processes favored wealthier applicants.
Topics:
Antitrust | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students | Taxes & FinancesDate:
ACE Issue Brief on Changes to Green Energy Tax Provisions in the OBBB (Dec. 9, 2025)
The American Council on Education (ACE) published an issue brief titled “Changes to Key Inflation Reduction Act Green Energy Tax Provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The brief provides a high-level overview on the major changes to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), including (1) hindrance on the ability of institutions to use many IRA tax credits; (2) repeal of certain commercial and transportation credits; (3) accelerated deadlines for wind and solar projects; and (4) new “Foreign Entity of Concern” restrictions.
Topics:
Environmental Health & Safety | Real Property, Facilities & Construction | Tax-Exempt Funding | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Elad v. NCAA (3rd Cir. Nov. 25, 2025)
Opinion Vacating and Remanding. Plaintiff, a football player at Rutgers University, challenged the NCAA’s “JUCO Rule,” which counts years spent at a junior college toward an athlete’s five-year eligibility clock, alleging that the rule unreasonably restrains the college-football-athlete labor market in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. A district court granted plaintiff a preliminary injunction enjoining the NCAA from enforcing the rule against him, following a failed effort by Rutgers University to obtain a waiver from the NCAA. On appeal, the Third Circuit vacated the district court’s ruling, holding the district court erred by failing to adequately define the relevant market for its analysis, and remanded the case for further consideration. The court reasoned that the district court merely recited plaintiff’s expert’s identified market and “did not engage in a fact-specific analysis of the relevant market despite the parties’ differing opinions on the topic.” The court further reasoned that the definition of the relevant market relied upon by the district court “[did] not account for changed market realities in Alston’s wake” and ordered the district court to conduct a relevant market analysis on remand.
Topics:
Antitrust | Athletics & Sports | Athletics Compliance & NCAA Rules | Student Athlete Issues | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Inc. v. Northwestern Univ. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2025)
Opinion and Order Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Inc., brought claims against Northwestern University for fraudulent concealment and for breach of contract or, alternatively, equitable accounting, after it donated several million dollars to fund a multi-year research project conducted under the direction of a specific professor, and subsequently learned that, due to the professor’s strained relationship with the university, the professor would be leaving the university. The court held plaintiff had pled sufficient facts to survive a motion to dismiss on its fraudulent concealment claim, finding that a special relationship existed between the parties that gave rise to a duty to disclose the fact that prior litigation between the professor and the university could impact his availability to oversee the research. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, finding that although the university had failed to provide annual reports about the use of the funds as required by their agreement, the plaintiff had failed to allege that it suffered any damages as a result. However, the court allowed the plaintiff’s equitable accounting claim to proceed because the plaintiff had adequately alleged facts demonstrating that it did not have “an adequate remedy at law” for the university’s failure to provide the report and because a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties.
Topics:
Contracts | Endowments & Gifts | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | Research | Taxes & Finances
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.