FILTERS



Find by DATE
Reset

Latest Cases & Developments


  • Date:

    United States v. Minnesota (D. Minn. Mar. 27, 2026)

    Opinion and Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, the United States, sued the state of Minnesota and the Minnesota Office of Higher Education, alleging that Minnesota’s in-state tuition law violates section 1623 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), which prohibits in-state tuition benefits for individuals who are not “lawfully present” in the United States, “on the basis of residence within a State,” unless a citizen is eligible for the same benefit without regard to state residency. The court held that, because Minnesota’s law allows a student to qualify for in-state tuition even if “their principal actual dwelling place is outside of Minnesota,” the law “[did] not determine eligibility . . . on the basis of residence,” and therefore was not preempted by IIRIRA. The court dismissed the government’s claims with prejudice.

    Topics:

    Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International Students

  • Date:

    OCR Enters into Agreements with 31 Colleges and Universities to End Partnerships with the PhD Project (Feb. 19, 2026)

    The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced that it has entered into 31 resolution agreements with institutions of higher education requiring them to cease their partnerships with the PhD project. In addition to ending collaboration with the PhD project, the institutions also agreed to conduct a review of their partnerships with external organizations to identify any that violate Title VI by restricting participation based on race. OCR indicated it is still negotiating with 14 schools.

    Topics:

    Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws | Faculty & Staff | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Immigration | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Students

  • Date:

    ACE Issue Brief: Immigration-Related Campus Concerns (Feb. 19, 2026) 

    The American Council on Education (ACE) published an issue brief providing guidance for campus leaders navigating the immigration policy environment under the Trump administration. The brief outlines the major categories of immigration status impacting higher education, issues related to DACA and international students, faculty, and staff, and provides guidance to campuses on potential enforcement actions.

    Topics:

    Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International Students

  • Date:

    Fridley Public School District, et al., v. Kristi Noem, et al., (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2026)

    Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. Plaintiffs, a coalition of school districts and a teachers union, sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and several federal officials, alleging that the implementation of the policy “Operation Metro Surge” in addition to the rescission of the previous longstanding “sensitive locations policy” violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) as arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs allege that the increase of ICE action at both K-12 schools and college campuses violate the rights of immigrants and create substantial disruption to the lives of U.S. citizens, noting that they have seen attendance declines of more than a third since the surge began. Plaintiffs further allege that the threat of enforcement has created a chilling effect and undermines access to education. Plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin DHS from enforcing the new policy and to prohibit DHS agents from conducting immigration enforcement actions within 1,000 feet of school property or a school bus stop.

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International Students

  • Date:

    Department of Homeland Security Final Rule on Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking to File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions (Dec. 29, 2025)

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its final rule on the current lottery system used to award H-1B visas to employers subject to the annual cap. The rule will implement a weighted selection process for H-1B registrations that will favor the allocation of H-1B visas to higher skilled and higher paid workers. The rule is set to go into effect on February 27, 2026 and is part of the FY 2027 H-1B lottery, beginning March 2026. (Currently, higher education institutions are exempt from the H-1B visa cap and lottery.)

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration

  • Date:

    Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D.D.C. Dec. 23, 2025)

    Opinion Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, the Chamber of Commerce and the Association of American Universities, brought a lawsuit challenging implementation of the September 19, 2025 Presidential Proclamation imposing a new $100,000 H-1B visa processing fee, asserting that the Proclamation was ultra vires and that its implementation violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court granted summary judgment for the defendants, holding (1) because the Proclamation was issued pursuant to an express statutory grant of authority to the President under the Immigration and Nationality Act, it was not ultra vires; and (2) given the “lawfully authorized nature” of the Proclamation, defendants’ actions to implement it did not violate the APA. In dismissing the plaintiffs’ APA claims, the court concluded that defendants’ “mere implementation of a legally permissible Proclamation [was] not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law” and further, their “lack of discretion to deviate from the President’s directives render[ed] any failure to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking harmless error.” Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on December 29, 2025.

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration

  • Date:

    Presidential Proclamation Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States (Dec. 16, 2025)

    The President issued a Proclamation, “Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States,” that continues and expands restrictions on entry of certain foreign nationals in several countries identified by the Administration as “high risk.” The Proclamation maintains full entry restrictions for the twelve countries identified in the June 4 Proclamation and now extends those restrictions to five additional countries: Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, South Sudan, and Syria. The Proclamation also adds full restrictions and entry limitations on individuals holding Palestinian-Authority-issued travel documents. The Proclamation maintains partial restrictions for four countries identified in the earlier proclamation (Burundi, Cuba, Togo, and Venezuela) and extends these partial restrictions to fifteen additional countries (Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Zambia, and Zimbabwe). Exceptions are present for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, and certain visa categories like athletes and diplomats. The Proclamation takes effect on January 1, 2026. The White House issued a Fact Sheet providing additional information on the Proclamation.

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration

  • Date:

    Öztürk v. Trump, et al. (D. Mass. Dec. 8, 2025)

    Opinion Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff, a Turkish national and doctoral candidate at Tufts Universitychallenged the government’s termination of her Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (“SEVIS”) record and sought injunctive relief to reinstate it, arguing the termination violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the First AmendmentThe court granted plaintiff’s motion, holding that (1) she was likely to succeed on her APA claim that the record termination was contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious; (2) she had made the requisite showing of irreparable harmand (3) the balance of the equities and the public interest favored granting the injunction. In concluding the government’s actions were likely arbitrary and capricious, the court noted the government’s shifting justifications” about the rationale for terminating plaintiff’s SEVIS record as well as conflicting statements about whether she “maintained” nonimmigrant legal status. The court also found plaintiff had made the requisite showing of irreparable harm finding that SEVIS termination had resulted in the loss of unique opportunities for plaintiff to work with her advisor and further her doctoral training and professional development. 

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | International Students

  • Date:

    ACE Letter to the Department of Homeland Security on H-1B Weighted Selection Process Proposed Rule (Oct. 24, 2025)

    The American Counsil on Education (ACE) and 20 other higher education associations sent comments to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on the proposed rule “Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking to File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions.” The letter notes the negative impact the rule would have on recently graduated international students, by reducing access to the H-1B visa program for early career professionals, including doctors who have recently graduated medical school and are entering residency programs. Additionally, ACE writes that the rule would limit the ability of institutions of higher education to recruit and retain international students, impacting those who wish to remain in the United States, and the U.S. economy at large. The letter concludes by asking the administration to withdraw the rule.

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration

  • Date:

    ACE Letter to DHS on H-1B Visa Fee Increase (Oct. 23, 2025)

    The American Council on Education (ACE), along with 31 higher education associations, sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) asking for clarity on how the September 19 Presidential Proclamation “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers” would be implemented and requesting that institutions of higher education be exempt from the new $100,000 fee for new H-1B visa applications.  

    Topics:

    Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration