FILTERS



Find by DATE
Reset

Latest Cases & Developments


  • Date:

    Donohue v. Capella Univ. (D. N.J. Aug. 22, 2023)

    Opinion granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.  Plaintiff, a former online doctoral student at Capella University, brought contract, negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims against the University after it expelled him when (1) the SafeAssign plagiarism detection program showed that he had plagiarized 100% of an assignment, and (2) he then subsequently failed to complete a “remediation assignment” with the required number of properly used citations.  In dismissing his contract claims, the court held plaintiff had not plausibly alleged that the University substantially departed from its access policies when it provided him only limited access to online resources during the period in which he was completing the remediation assignment.  It further held that he had not identified a policy provision the University violated by using the SafeAssign program, which he had alleged was “known to be faulty.”  The court held plaintiffs NIED claim failed because he had not alleged the University’s actions had caused the death or serious bodily injury of another individual. 

    Topics:

    Academic Performance and Misconduct | Students

  • Date:

    Wang v. Univ. of Pittsburgh (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2023)

    Memorandum Opinion granting-in-part and denying-in-part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint.  Plaintiff, a cardiologist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical School and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and a former director of the joint clinical cardiac electrophysiology fellowship program of the University and UPMC, alleged under Title VII that the University, UPMC, and three officials retaliated against him by removing him as director of the fellowship program and barring him from interacting with fellows and residents after he published an article critical of the use of race and ethnic factors in admissions in medical schools, residency programs, and fellowship programs.  The court dismissed plaintiff’s assertion that the March 2020 publication of his article was protected activity under Title VII, finding that it was a general complaint about the industry and did not specifically address practices at the University or UPMC.  It permitted him to proceed, however, regarding statements he made in a July 2020 meeting with University and UPMC officials in which he raised his concerns that their admissions practices might be contrary to law. 

    Topics:

    Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Retaliation

  • Date:

    Iyebote v. Meharry Med. Coll. (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 22, 2023)

    Report and Recommendation to enforce parties’ settlement agreement.  Plaintiff, a former participant in the residency program at Meharry Medical College, brought sexual harassment, retaliation, and disability discrimination claims against the College after she reported incidents of harassment to a supervisor and was terminated from the program.  After the court granted-in-part and denied-in-part the College’s motion for summary judgment, the parties agreed in mediation to terms to settle the remaining claims, including plaintiff’s return to the program.  Plaintiff, however, refused to enter into the proposed Settlement Agreement and Release, citing that she had subsequently learned that the School’s accreditation was probationary, which she alleged would make it harder for her to transfer to a different program.  In recommending to grant the School’s motion to enforce the agreement, the U.S. Magistrate Judge first noted that plaintiff was not a resident in the program when the School’s accreditor placed its programs on probationary status and required it to provide notice to its residents.  The court then held (1) that the School did not otherwise have a duty to notify plaintiff of its accreditation status, and (2) that plaintiff had presented no evidence that the School had otherwise concealed the information, which was posted on its website, or that the accreditation status would make her transfer harder. 

    Topics:

    Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

  • Date:

    Gage v. Midwestern Univ. (D. Ariz. Aug. 7, 2023)

    Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.  Plaintiff, a former Pathology Case Coordinator at the Diagnostic Pathology Center at Midwestern University, brought disability discrimination claims against the University after he provided a doctor’s note that he should not work with formaldehyde because he had experienced symptoms of chemical sensitivity.  After the Ninth Circuit vacated summary judgment to the University on the grounds that an impairment need not be permanent to show a disability and that duration is only one factor to be considered, the district court again granted summary judgment in favor of the University, finding also that plaintiff failed to show that his symptoms amounted to an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity or that the University regarded him as having such an impairment. 

    Topics:

    Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity

  • Date:

    Career Colls. and Schs. of Texas v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2023)

    Order granting Plaintiff-Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal.  Plaintiff, the Career Colleges and Schools of Texas, sued to challenge borrower-defense and closed-school provisions of Final Regulations on Institutional Eligibility Under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as Amended; Student Assistance General Provisions; Federal Perkins Loan Program; Family Education Loan Program; and William D. Ford Direct Loan Program, which became effective on July 1, 2023.  The Fifth Circuit granted plaintiff-appellant’s request for an emergency injunction and ordered that the case be heard during the panel’s sitting commencing November 6, 2023.  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

Website Experience Survey

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Did you find what you were looking for?
Please rate your experience finding content on the nacua.org website.
Please rate your overall satisfaction with the nacua.org website.