FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Johnson v. Fliger, et al. (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2026)
Order Granting in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff, a history professor at Bakersfield Community College, brought First Amendment facial and as-applied challenges to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) regulations governing the California Community College system, as well as a California Education Code provision permitting discipline for violations of those regulations. While the court rejected plaintiff’s facial challenge to the DEIA regulations, it found that plaintiff was likely to succeed on the merits of his as-applied viewpoint discrimination and compelled speech claims. In granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, the court found that defendants’ general interest in enforcing the DEIA regulations did not outweigh plaintiff’s First Amendment right not to be sanctioned for expressing a contrary viewpoint on DEIA matters and not to be compelled to speak in support of the DEIA principles. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss and enjoined defendants from investigating, disciplining, or terminating plaintiff based on his social or political speech in his teaching or scholarship, or in his capacity as a private citizen. However, the court clarified that the injunction would not extend to plaintiff’s speech in his official capacity on college committees or to the requirement that he complete DEIA training as a condition of serving on faculty screening committees.
Topics:
Academic Freedom & Employee Speech | Constitutional Issues | Faculty & Staff | First Amendment & Free SpeechDate:
OCR Enters into Agreements with 31 Colleges and Universities to End Partnerships with the PhD Project (Feb. 19, 2026)
The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced that it has entered into 31 resolution agreements with institutions of higher education requiring them to cease their partnerships with the PhD project. In addition to ending collaboration with the PhD project, the institutions also agreed to conduct a review of their partnerships with external organizations to identify any that violate Title VI by restricting participation based on race. OCR indicated it is still negotiating with 14 schools.
Topics:
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws | Faculty & Staff | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Immigration | Race and National Origin Discrimination | StudentsDate:
ACE Issue Brief: Immigration-Related Campus Concerns (Feb. 19, 2026)
The American Council on Education (ACE) published an issue brief providing guidance for campus leaders navigating the immigration policy environment under the Trump administration. The brief outlines the major categories of immigration status impacting higher education, issues related to DACA and international students, faculty, and staff, and provides guidance to campuses on potential enforcement actions.
Topics:
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International StudentsDate:
Court Grants Joint Motion by Parties to Dismiss NEA Lawsuit challenging February 14 Dear Colleague Letter (Feb. 18, 2026)
A federal district court judge in New Hampshire has formally dismissed a year-long lawsuit brought by the NEA, ACLU, and others challenging the Trump Administration’s February 14 2025 Dear Colleague Letter (“DCL”) after the parties submitted a joint motion to drop the case. The lawsuit challenged the DCL, as well as a related certification requirement for schools and Frequently Asked Questions document, alleging that the guidance violated the First and Fifth Amendments and was in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The joint motion to dismiss was filed on February 3, shortly after the DCL was vacated and set aside by a district judge in Maryland in American Federation of Teachers, et al. v. United States Department of Education. The joint motion requires the Department to agree that “[t]he challenged Agency Actions will not be relied on in any way by Defendants including by way of seeking to enforce its substance through [the Department of Education] or [the Department of Justice] civil rights enforcement procedures.”
Topics:
Admissions | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Diversity in Employment | Faculty & Staff | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Race and National Origin Discrimination | StudentsDate:
GSA Releases Draft Language for New Certifications for Federal Grants in the System for Award Management (Feb. 18, 2026)
The General Services Administration (GSA) released draft language for a new certification in the System for Award Management (SAM) that would require institutions receiving federal funds to affirm that they do not engage in “illegal DEI” practices. GSA wrote that this proposed update is to align itself with the Department of Justice’s “Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination” from July 2025. The proposed language would require entities to certify that they do not engage in activities that violate federal antidiscrimination law, and clarifies the obligation as it applies to DEI, immigration, and anti-terrorism. The deadline for public comments is March 30, 2026.
Topics:
Contracts | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | ResearchDate:
Young Americans for Freedom, et al. v. Department of Education (8th Cir. Feb. 17, 2026)
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal. Plaintiffs, the Young Americans for Freedom, sought an injunction prohibiting the Department of Education from utilizing race eligibility criteria to award grants for the Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program. The district court denied the motion, finding that plaintiffs lacked standing because they failed to include the relevant higher education institutions, which control applicant selection, not the Department. Plaintiffs appealed the denial of their request for an injunction to the Eighth Circuit but before the court could render a decision, the parties agreed to drop the lawsuit. In requesting the court to dismiss the case, the motion highlights (1) the Department’s determination that the program’s race eligibility criteria is unconstitutional and (2) it’s commitment to rescinding the race criteria in an upcoming rulemaking.
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Equal Protection | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Race and National Origin Discrimination | StudentsDate:
Department of Labor Announces $65M in Grants for Community Colleges (Feb. 17, 2026)
The Department of Labor announced the availability of $65 million in funding to support programs that help community colleges develop high-quality, short term training programs. The sixth round of Strengthening Community College Training Grants funding is focused on programs that seek eligibility for the newly authorized Workforce Pell Grants.
Topics:
Contracts | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | ResearchDate:
United States of America v. President and Fellows of Harvard (D. Mass. Feb. 13, 2026)
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. Plaintiff, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), filed a lawsuit against Harvard University alleging that the university failed to comply with federal information requests related to a Title VI compliance review of the university’s admissions practices. DOJ contends that while the university has provided aggregated admissions data, it has failed to provide individual level applicant data. DOJ requested applicant data on grade point average, standardized test scores, essays and extracurricular activities—disaggregated by race and ethnicity – with an initial deadline of April 25, 2025. DOJ alleges that the information is necessary to determine whether the university is “continuing to discriminate in its admissions process” and further alleges that the university’s refusal violates Title VI regulations and breaches the university’s contractual obligations as a recipient of federal funding. DOJ seeks a court order requiring the university to produce the requested records.
Topics:
Admissions | StudentsDate:
OCR Investigation of Louisiana Board of Regents Over Alleged Race-Based Priority in Master Plan (Feb. 13, 2026)
The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced that it has initiated a directed investigation into the Louisiana Board of Regents to determine whether its Master Plan for Higher Education violates Title VI by authorizing “racially-exclusionary” practices and initiatives. Specifically, OCR alleges the Board’s executive budgets have included performance objectives requiring schools to prioritize non-white and non-Asian students and sets a target to raise matriculation and graduation of these students from a baseline of 14,579 in 2020–21 to 16,000 in 2025–26. OCR wrote that this objective to “prioritize recruitment and graduation efforts for all races other than white and Asian appears to blatantly violate not only America’s antidiscrimination laws but our nation’s core principles.”
Topics:
Admissions | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Students
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.