FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
OCR Fact Sheet: Ensuring Equal Opportunity Based on Sex in School Athletic Programs in the Context of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Activities (Jan. 16, 2025)
The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), published a Fact Sheet clarifying that under Title IX, schools remain responsible for offering equal opportunities in their athletic programs, including Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation paid to college athletes. Specifically, the Fact Sheet states that NIL deals should be considered part of an institution’s athletic financial assistance, similar to grants-in-aid or cost-of-attendance funds, which are used to calculate equal athletic opportunities for men and women. The Fact Sheet further explains that a school’s Title IX obligations may apply regardless of whether a student-athlete ultimately secures NIL benefits through their own school or with third parties. Finally, the Fact Sheet notes it does not have the force and effect of law and is not meant to be binding beyond what is required by statutory and regulatory requirements already in place.
Topics:
Athletics & Sports | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Gender Equity in Athletics | StudentsDate:
OCR Resolution Agreement with Emory University re Title VI Compliance (Jan. 16, 2025)
Resolution Agreement between the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and Emory University resolving a complaint that the latter responded inadequately to discrimination based on shared Palestinian, Muslim, and/or Arab ancestry and/or race. The associated Resolution Letter noted that OCR joined the University’s President in expressing concern with the “gratuitous violence of … law enforcement” seen through publicized videos of arrests during the April 2024 protests, which may have created a hostile environment for Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim university members. OCR expressed concerns regarding potential ambiguity in the University’s publicly available policies and procedures on reporting discrimination and noted that clarification could support compliance with the requirements of Title VI. The Agreement sets forth the University’s commitment to: (1) revise its nondiscrimination policies and procedures; (2) conduct annual training for all students, employees, investigators, and campus law enforcement; (3) engage in file reviews; (4) administer a climate survey; and (5) report out regarding training, assessment, and reviews.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Religious Discrimination & AccommodationDate:
OCR Resolution Agreement with the University of Washington re Title VI Compliance (Jan. 15, 2025)
Resolution Agreement between the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the University of Washington resolving a complaint that the latter responded inadequately to discrimination based on shared Jewish ancestry. The associated Resolution Letter stated that OCR reviewed approximately 140 reports of alleged shared ancestry discrimination or harassment that were submitted to the University during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 academic years. OCR noted that the University took several steps to address incidents, which otherwise may have created a hostile environment based on shared ancestry on campus, including statements from University leadership with attached resources, meeting with students, as well as creating multiple task forces and holding several focus groups. Notwithstanding, OCR concluded that the University could have taken additional steps to assess and address incidents of a potential hostile environment on campus, as existent University responses were not necessarily designed to fully remedy any existing hostile environments resulting from shared ancestry-based harassment. The Agreement set forth the University’s commitment to: (1) review and update policies and procedures; (2) provide training to investigators, staff, and students; (3) conduct a climate assessment; (4) engage in file reviews; and (5) report out regarding training, assessment, and reviews.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Religious Discrimination & AccommodationDate:
Department of Education Overview of the Law Webpage Updated Following the Vacating of the 2024 Rule (Jan. 14, 2025)
The U.S. Department of Education (the Department) updated its resource page on Title IX following the January 9, 2025, court order vacating the 2024 Final Rule. The page notes that “on January 9, 2025, a federal district court issued a decision vacating the 2024 Final Rule. Consistent with the court’s order, the 2024 Title IX regulations and these resources are not effective in any jurisdiction.” No new resources have been posted; the 2020 amendments are available on the webpage, along with additional information and technical assistance.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination | Students | Title IX & Student Sexual MisconductDate:
OCR Resolution Letter with UCLA Finding Insufficient Evidence re Response to Alleged Antisemitic Harassment (Jan. 13, 2025)
Resolution Agreement between the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), resolving a complaint that alleged the University failed to respond promptly or effectively to alleged harassment based on shared Jewish ancestry in 2018. During a Students for Justice in Palestine conference on the University’s campus, students expressed concern related to potential harassment, before, during, and after the conference. Following its investigation, OCR concluded that the University’s response to the alleged harassment did not violate federal civil rights requirements. Specifically, OCR found the University took timely, reasonable, and effective steps to address student concerns by (1) working to align time, place, and manner restrictions while permitting the conference to be a private event; (2) working with students and campus security prioritizing safety; (3) providing students the opportunity to present counter-messaging before and during the conference; (4) ensuring University administrators were present and accessible throughout the conference and afterwards; (5) widely publicizing how to file a complaint with the University regarding harassment; and (6) publishing an opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times from the University Chancellor warning of the dangers of antisemitic forms of anti-Zionism.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Religious Discrimination & AccommodationDate:
OCR Resolution Agreement with Lehigh University re Title VI Compliance (Jan. 13, 2025)
Resolution Agreement between the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and Lehigh University resolving a complaint that the latter responded inadequately to alleged discrimination based on shared Jewish ancestry. The associated Resolution Letter noted that OCR was concerned that the University had not evaluated whether individual incidents of alleged harassment or aggregate incidents of alleged harassment that occurred during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 academic years contributed to a hostile environment for students based on shared ancestry. OCR noted the important steps taken by the University to fulfill its Title VI obligations with respect to shared ancestry through coordinated events and programs, as well as communication from University leadership. The Agreement set forth the University’s commitment to: (1) revise its nondiscrimination policies and procedures; (2) conduct annual training for all employees, staff, and students; (3) engage in file reviews; (4) administer a climate survey; and (5) report out regarding training, assessment, and reviews.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Religious Discrimination & AccommodationDate:
U.S. Department of Labor Announces Tuition Reimbursement Cannot be Factored into Wage Garnishment (Dec. 18, 2024)
The U.S. Department of Labor announced through an Opinion Letter that tuition reimbursement does not constitute earnings for purposes of the Consumer Credit Protection Act’s (CCPA) limitations on wage garnishment. The Department concluded that since tuition reimbursement funds “are not related to level of employee pay, services, or performance” and are therefore not earrings as defined by the CCPA, an employer should not include such payments and reimbursements when calculating an employee’s disposable earnings for purposes of determining the maximum amount of an employee’s pay that may be garnished.
Topics:
Compensation & Benefits | Taxes & FinancesDate:
Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act Passed House of Representatives (Jan. 14, 2025)
The United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 28, the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025” (the Bill), which seeks to amend the Education Amendments of 1972. The Bill states that “it shall be a violation [ ] for a recipient of Federal financial assistance who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.” It also defines sex as “based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”
Topics:
Athletics & Sports | Gender Equity in AthleticsDate:
ACE Issue Brief on Campus Challenge Under Trump’s Immigration Policies (Jan. 16, 2025)
American Council on Education (ACE) Issue Brief on “Campus Challenges under Trump’s Immigration Policies.” The Brief is designed to help campuses navigate the shifting landscape of immigration policies under the new administration, drawing on lessons from the first Trump administration. The Brief explores what is to come regarding policies for international students, faculty and staff, students with discretionary status, and Dreamers, as well as potential enforcement for sanctuary campuses and sensitive locations. Finally, the Brief includes legal and non-legal resources to guide campuses as immigration policies and trends develop.
Topics:
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) | Employment of Foreign Nationals | Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International Students
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.