FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Lee v. Yale Univ. (2nd Cir. June 20, 2023)
Summary Order affirming dismissal. Plaintiff, a forensic psychologist and former voluntary Assistant Clinical Professor in the Law and Psychiatry Division of the Yale School of Medicine, brought contract and state law claims against the University, alleging it violated her academic freedom when it declined to renew her appointment citing ethical concerns over her public statements diagnosing political figures with a “shared psychosis.” In affirming dismissal, the Second Circuit held that her contract claims failed because she had not adequately alleged a promise to renew her appointment even in the face of such public statements. It further held that her claim under a state statute establishing liability for an employer who disciplines or discharges an employee for exercising First Amendment rights failed because she had not adequately alleged remuneration.
Topics:
Academic Performance and Misconduct | Employee Discipline & Due Process | Faculty & Staff | StudentsDate:
Harmon v. Tex. S. Univ. (Tex. App. June 15, 2023)
Opinion reversing dismissal and remanding. Plaintiff, a former nontenured English instructor at Texas Southern University (TSU) who had symptoms of osteoarthritis in her knee and was planning FMLA leave for knee surgery, brought a state law disability discrimination claim against TSU after it terminated her employment contract for failure to attend a mandatory meeting with her Department Chair and Dean concerning her professionalism. The trial court granted TSU’s plea to the jurisdiction. In reversing and remanding, the Court of Appeals of Texas found that she sufficiently alleged that her knee condition was a disability; that the Chair was likely aware of her need for a medical accommodation from her use of a cane, use of a “knee sleeve,” and references to doctors’ appointments; and that the Chair declined her requests to change the time of the mandatory meeting with her Chair and Dean.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
Doe v. Oberlin Coll. (N.D. Ohio June 16, 2023)
Opinion and Order granting-in-part and denying-in-part Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff, a student at Oberlin College, brought Title IX selective enforcement, contract, and negligence claims against the College and its Title IX Coordinator after a female student alleged that plaintiff had engaged in sexual misconduct with her when she was intoxicated. The College’s investigation subsequently found plaintiff had not violated its Sexual Misconduct Policy. The court permitted plaintiff to proceed on his selective enforcement claim, finding he sufficiently alleged that even though his accuser believed plaintiff was intoxicated at the time, the college did not investigate her for misconduct too. It cautioned that to show that he and his accuser were similarly situated, and thereby to survive summary judgment, plaintiff must show that they were equally intoxicated at the time. The court also permitted plaintiff’s breach of contract claim to proceed related to the College’s alleged departures from its disciplinary policies, but it dismissed his negligence claim as duplicative of his contract claim.
Topics:
Students | Title IX & Student Sexual MisconductDate:
Univ. of Ky. v. Regard, et al. (K.Y. June 15, 2023)
Opinion affirming denial of governmental immunity. Plaintiffs, students at the University of Kentucky during the spring 2020 semester, brought contract claims against the University after it ceased in-person instruction and closed campus facilities due to the coronavirus pandemic. The University Bulletin detailed different mandatory fees for students with at least one on-campus course and those studying entirely online, but the Bulletin was not referenced in the Student Financial Obligation, to which students agreed in order to register. Affirming denial of the University’s assertion governmental immunity defense, the Supreme Court of Kentucky held that the University’s Student Financial Obligation incorporated the University Bulletin because the “two documents were delivered together, share mutuality of subject matter, and the overwhelming implication and surrounding circumstances leave no doubt that they were meant to be read together, thereby forming on binding contract.”
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | CoronavirusDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Education Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023—Section 504 (June 13, 2023)
U.S. Department of Education Uniform Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023. The filing indicates that the Department of Education plans to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in August 2023 to amend its regulations implementing Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Education Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023—FERPA (June 13, 2023)
U.S. Department of Education Uniform Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023. The filing indicates that the Department of Education plans to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in November 2023 to amend its FERPA regulations.
Topics:
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) | Privacy & TransparencyDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Education Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023—Shared Ancestry & Ethnicity(June 13, 2023)
U.S. Department of Education Uniform Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023. The filing indicates that the Department of Education plans to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in December 2023 to amend its regulations implementing Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to address harassment and other discrimination based on shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics. The filing notes that “OCR has received complaints of harassment and assaults directed at Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and other students based on their shared ancestry or ethnicity.”
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.