FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Florance v. Barnett (7th Cir. Oct. 25, 2023)
Order affirming dismissal. Plaintiff, a former Indiana University School of Medicine student, brought due process claims against multiple University officials related to student loan collections. Plaintiff took a student loan through a program administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Later, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), rated him as having a permanent and total disability. As he appeared to be gainfully employed and did not meet the statutory requirements for cancelation, the University declined to recommend cancelation of the loan and initiated collections proceedings against him. After plaintiff disputed HHS’s initial denial of his request for cancelation, HHS canceled his loan, and the University dismissed the collections case. In affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, the Seventh Circuit held that he did not have a protected interest in loan cancellation since under the HHS loan program whether a borrower qualifies for cancelation due to a disability is a discretionary determination left to HHS, not an entitlement determined by the VA’s disability rating.
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Due Process | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | StudentsDate:
Rivadeneira v. The Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. (Fla. App. Oct. 25, 2023)
Order reversing and remanding dismissal, and certifying a question to the Florida Supreme Court. Plaintiff, a student at the University of South Florida, on behalf of himself and a putative class, brought contract claims against the University after it ceased in-person instruction and closed campus facilities due to the coronavirus pandemic. The trial court dismissed the claims on the ground of sovereign immunity. In reversing, the Florida Court of Appeals held that whether the parties’ contract included a promise to provide on-campus services and the University’s assertion of sovereign immunity are more appropriately resolved at the summary judgment stage. The appeals court also certified to the Florida Supreme Court the question, “Should a motion to dismiss a breach of contract claim against a state university alleging the university’s failure to provide its students with access to on-campus services and facilities be granted based on sovereign immunity if the complaint alleged a contract between the parties but the attached documents alleged to comprise that contract do not specifically obligate the university to provide the on-campus services and facilities that the state university allegedly failed to provide?”
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | CoronavirusDate:
Medina v. Univ. of Utah (10th Cir. Oct. 19, 2023)
Order and Judgment affirming dismissal. Plaintiff, the director of BioKids, the University of Utah School of Biological Sciences (SBS) childcare center, brought procedural due process, contract, and state-law retaliation claims against the SBS Director and the University after her employment was (1) terminated through a Reduction in Force (RIF) when the School transferred management of BioKids to the University’s Center for Child & Family Resources as operational needs changed during the coronavirus pandemic, and then (2) reinstated when the arrangement expired. In affirming summary judgment in favor of the University, the Tenth Circuit held that plaintiff waived her procedural due process claim by not exercising her appeal rights under the University’s RIF policy. Her breach of contract claim failed because the RIF policy under which she was terminated was itself a part of her employment contract with the University. Her state-law retaliation claim failed because (1) rather than expressing concern that a planned expansion in BioKids’ capacity would violate state licensing requirements she succeeded in securing a variance from the Utah Department of Health to maintain the center’s compliance, and (2) she pointed to no evidence suggesting that she made a good faith report to the University that she anticipated any regulatory violation.
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | Contracts | Due Process | Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment | Faculty & StaffDate:
DHS NPRM on H-1B Requirements and F-1 Flexibility (Oct. 23, 2023)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Modernizing H-1B Requirements, Providing Flexibility in the F-1 Program, and Program Improvements Affecting Other Nonimmigrant Workers. The proposed regulations would “streamline requirements for the H-1B program by: (1) revising the regulatory definition and criteria for a ‘specialty occupation’; (2) clarifying that ‘normally’ does not mean ‘always’ within the criteria for a specialty occupation; and (3) clarifying that a position may allow a range of degrees, although there must be a direct relationship between the required degree field(s) and the duties of the position.” The regulations would also “change the definition of ‘nonprofit research organization’ and ‘governmental research organization’ by replacing ‘primarily engaged’ and ‘primary mission’ to ‘fundamental activity’ to permit a nonprofit entity or governmental research organization that conducts research as a fundamental activity … to meet the definition of a nonprofit research entity.” They would also provide greater flexibility with automatic extension for F-1 visa holders who seek to change their status to H-1B.
Topics:
Faculty & Staff | Immigration | International StudentsDate:
OCR Resolution Agreement with Taft College re: response to discrimination based on gender identity (Oct. 19, 2023)
Resolution Agreement between the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) and Taft College resolving an investigation into the University’s response to allegations college employees harassed a student who is transgender through sex stereotyping and misgendering. Through the resolution agreement, the College committed to revising its Title IX policies and procedures; providing written guidance and training to its Title IX Coordinators, administrators, and staff; additional reporting and monitoring; and providing reimbursement to the student for expenses related to counseling and therapy. A related Resolution Letter summarized the findings of OCR’s investigation.
Topics:
Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation DiscriminationDate:
ACE Database on Post-SFFA v. Harvard & UNC Decision Resource: Admissions and Beyond (Oct. 16, 2023)
Database from the American Council on Education (ACE) of Post-SFFA v. Harvard & UNC Decision Resources. This new website will house “a variety of external articles, tools, research, analyses, and other materials that may be of interest” as institutions consider their policies, practices, and initiatives following the Supreme Court’s decision.
Topics:
Admissions | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Students
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.