FILTERS



Find by DATE
Reset

Latest Cases & Developments


  • Date:

    NCAA Q&A on House Settlement (Jun. 13, 2025)

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) along with the Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten Conference, Big 12 Conference, Pac-12 Conference, and Southeastern Conference published a Question and Answer on the implementation of the House settlement to provide guidance to Division I membership on the implementation of the settlement agreement. The document details changes to Division I legislation, roster limits, benefits cap, Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) contracts and payments, and arbitration. 

    Topics:

    Athletics & Sports | Athletics Compliance & NCAA Rules | Athletics Operations | Student Athlete Issues | Students

  • Date:

    Qaddumi v. Hartzell (W. D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2025)

    Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, a student at the University of Texas at Austin alleged violation of the First Amendment by way of content and viewpoint discrimination and First Amendment retaliation against defendants, several administrators at the University. Plaintiff was suspended from the University following his involvement in planning a protest about the ongoing violence in Gaza as a member of the Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC). Plaintiff maintains that the planned protest activities were peaceful in nature, however defendants counter that the protests held by aligned groups at other higher education institutions were “creating campus encampments” and feared that similar disruption would occur on the University’s campus, and subsequently issued a directive ordering students not to hold the event, or to face discipline under the University rules. Simultaneously, the Governor of Texas issued an Executive Order that instructed the University to ensure that its policies were being enforced, and student groups such as PSC were disciplined as needed for violating the policies. Plaintiff and other students proceeded with the protest despite the directive to cancel it. Plaintiff was then arrested for alleged trespass and suspended for one year after the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings. The court dismissed plaintiff’s claim for damages against University administrators in their individual capacity based on qualified immunity and his request for declaratory relief as to the cancellation of the April 2024 protest. In allowing plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief on his suspension to proceed, the court reasoned that the University’s application of its policies in the instant case constituted viewpoint discrimination. The court highlighted the following alleged facts that could give rise to the inference of animus or discriminatory motive by the defendants: (1) defendants’ motive for suspension was derived in part by the Governor’s order, which the court previously found likely constituted viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment; (2) plaintiff was suspended “at least in part because of the prior actions of a student group of which he is a not a member but only shares similar views”; and (3) “other students on the scene of the protest, who did not have the same views as [plaintiff], were not similarly disciplined, nor have other similar protests on different topics historically resulted in [the University] forbidding protests and subsequently suspending students.” 

    Topics:

    Constitutional Issues | First Amendment & Free Speech | Student Speech & Campus Unrest | Students

  • Date:

    DCL: SAIG Enrollment Webinars and Additional Resources (Jun. 12, 2025)

    Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) from the Department of Education Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) announcing Student Aid Internet Gateway (SAIG) enrollment webinars and additional resources to ease users’ transition to the new system. The webinars are a series of live, instructor-led webinars about new features and functionality coming to FSA Partner Connect in July 2025. Registration is not required, and participation will be available on a first-come, first-served basis, accommodating up to 10,000 attendees in each session. The first webinar is scheduled for June 30, 1-2:30-pm reviewing the Account Access Management Center, with future sessions scheduled to review Enrollment and Management for Systems and Services. Finally, self-paced learning resources will also be available in July, including job aids to walk users through various processes and webinar recordings.  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

  • Date:

    Hushen v. Gonzales (Colo. Jun. 9, 2025)

    Opinion Reversing and Remanding. Petitioners, several high school students and their mothers who were previously sued by respondent, a fellow classmate, for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress following a Title IX investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against respondent, bring the current “special motion to dismiss” under Colorado’s anti-SLAPP statute. Petitioners allege that the statements they made in the school’s investigations were absolutely privileged from use in a tort action because they were made during a quasi-judicial proceeding. The question before the court was “whether the doctrine of absolute privilege applies to statements made in connection with a public school district’s formal Title IX investigation.” The Court explained that a proceeding is quasi-judicial if it involves: “(1) a determination of the interests, rights, or duties of specific individuals and (2) the application of current law or policy to past and present facts.” The court further explained that procedural and “due process concerns are independent of the assessment of whether a proceeding is quasi-judicial.” In finding that the Title IX investigation against respondent was a quasi-judicial proceeding, and petitioners’ statements during the investigation were subject to absolute privilege, the court held that petitioners’ statements could not be used as the basis for any tort claims against them. The Court’s holding notably contrasts with the finding in Kahn v. Yale University, 347 Conn. 1, 295 A.3d 855 (2023), where the Connecticut Supreme Court found that a University’s Title IX process lacked the procedural rigor to qualify as quasi-judicial—thus, the defendants’ statements made during the Title IX investigation process were not absolutely privileged.

    Topics:

    Sexual Misconduct | Students | Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct

  • Date:

    U.S. Department of Education to Implement New Identity Validation Processes (Jun. 6, 2025)

    U.S. Department of Education Office of Federal Student Aid (the Department) announced it will launch a nationwide effort to eliminate identity theft and fraud in federal student aid programs for the fall 2025 semester to protect taxpayers and reduce the administrative burden on colleges and universities. In the interim, the Department will require institutions of higher education to validate the identity of certain first-time applicants who are enrolled in the summer term to prevent identity theft fraud. The Department expects the number of students requiring identity validation during the summer to be relatively low, and will implement a permanent screening process for each FAFSA applicant. The Department shared that since investing in and focusing on fraud detection efforts, it has identified almost 150,000 suspect identities in current FAFSA forms, and those applicants will be marked for required live identity verification by schools before aid can be disbursed. Finally, as part of the fraud prevention effort, the Department will be making changes to the acceptable documentation for identity validation, noting that an applicant must present, either in person or on a live video conference, an unexpired, valid, government issued photo identification to an institutionally authorized individual and the institution must preserve a copy of the documentation. Guidance on the new required processes can be found here.  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

  • Date:

    In Re: College Athlete NIL Litigation (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2025)

    Opinion Regarding Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement. Plaintiffs, current and former Division I student-athletes who allege defendants, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and Conference defendants, including the Pac-12 Conference, Big Ten Conference, Big 12 Conference, Southeastern Conference, and Atlantic Coast Conference violated antitrust laws, specifically the Sherman Act. Plaintiffs challenged the NCAA’s prohibition on student-athlete compensation, its restriction on the number of scholarships institutions can provide to Division I student-athletes in each sport, and sought the ability to receive compensation from third parties, institutions, and conferences for the use of their name, image, or likeness (NIL). The parties negotiated a settlement agreement (the Agreement) for more than a year. The Agreement requires defendants to pay $2.567 billion in total compensation to plaintiffs and class members who competed between 2016 and present day. It also requires the NCAA to modify its rules to eliminate existing scholarship limits and allows for adoption of Division I sports roster limitations. The Agreement requires that any endorsement deal between a booster and an athlete will be vetted to ensure it is for a “valid business purpose.” The opt-in deadline for non-defendant schools to commit to revenue sharing is June 15, 2025, while the first date for direct institutional revenue sharing payments to student-athletes will begin is July 1, 2025.

    Topics:

    Athletics & Sports | Athletics Compliance & NCAA Rules | Athletics Operations | Gender Equity in Athletics | Student Athlete Issues | Students

  • Date:

    United States of America v. State of Texas (N.D. Tex. Jun. 4, 2025)

    Order and Final Judgment Permanently Enjoining Defendants. Plaintiff, the United States of America, brought suit against the State of Texas alleging that the Texas Education Code allows people who are not lawfully present in the United States to qualify for reduced tuition at public state colleges. Plaintiff contends that such action is prohibited by federal law and asked the Court to permanently enjoin the enforcement of certain provisions of the Texas Education Code that it asserts are in conflict with federal immigration law. Plaintiff maintains that since 2001, Texas law has allowed undocumented migrants who establish residency in Texas to benefit from reduced, in-state tuition rates while denying the same benefit to U.S. citizens who are not residents of Texas through the Texas Dream Act. Plaintiff alleged that defendant violated the supremacy clause as it expressly violates federal immigration law’s prohibition on providing postsecondary education benefits based on residency. Within the same day of plaintiff filing its complaint, the Court ruled in plaintiff’s favor permanently enjoining defendant from enforcing the Texas Education Code as applied to aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States. 

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

  • Date:

    U.S. Department of Education Announces Plans to Address Student Aid Fraud (May 28, 2025)

    U.S. Department of Education (the Department) announced plans to address fraud in student aid after a recent comprehensive analysis found “nearly $90 million disbursed to ineligible recipients.” The Department plans to (1) strengthen real-time data-sharing with the Social Security Administration to prevent identity theft and avoid erroneous distribution to deceased individuals; (2) gain additional specificity on student status from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to prevent disbursement to individuals granted immigration parole status (individuals who are not immediately eligible for student aid); (3) resume National Student Loan Database System post screening for the 2024-25 and 2025-26 FAFSA cycles to ensure that students only access aid they are eligible to receive; and (4) use data models to flag applications with suspicious or inconsistent information to identify individuals suspected of using someone else’s identity to complete FAFSA forms.  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

  • Date:

    Practice Guide on Race Conscious Scholarships and Financial Aid (May 27, 2025)

    NACUA’s new Practice Guide on Race Conscious Scholarships and Financial Aid. The Practice Guide reviews the necessary steps postsecondary institutions should take to verify that financial aid awards and scholarships are structured and administered in a race-neutral manner in light of heightened scrutiny accompanying changes in the legality of race-based affirmative action in admissions. It provides a primer on the relevant legal and regulatory background and reviews methods for navigating existing restricted scholarships, such as “pool and match” methodology. NACUA thanks its Saul Ewing members Josh Richards, Amy Piccola, and Matt Reinhart for their assistance in preparing this Practice Guide on Race Conscious Scholarships and Financial Aid.  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students

  • Date:

    U.S. Department of Education Updates on Expanded Late Disbursement Flexibilities and SAI for the 2024-25 FAFSA Cycle (May 27, 2025)

    U.S. Department of Education Office of Federal Student Aid (the Department) announced the extension of flexibilities for late disbursements to all students who filed a FAFSA form for the 2024-25 award year who were or are impacted by a known issue announced by the Department, which prevented their official Student Aid Index (SAI) from being calculated by the FAFSA Processing System (FPS) prior to the end of their enrollment. The Department shared that it is aware of the ongoing FPS issues, stating that in some cases, records with a reject code can be resolved by the applicant or the school, but if both are blocked from resolving the issue and thus from obtaining an official SAI by the known system issue, they should “document the issue in the student’s file and wait for a resolution from the Department” while the Department works to implement permanent fixes for the issues. It also encouraged institutions to “utilize the additional flexibilities provided … to award … aid and make late disbursements to students who would have otherwise been eligible to receive Title IV funds prior to the end of their enrollment.”  

    Topics:

    Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Students