FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Anders v. Cal. State Univ. (9th Cir. Jan. 17, 2024) (unpub.)
Opinion vacating denial of class certification and remanding. Plaintiffs, members of the women’s lacrosse team at Fresno State University, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, brought Title IX gender equity claims against the University after it discontinued its women’s lacrosse, men’s wrestling, and men’s tennis teams. The district court denied class certification, citing a conflict between the interests of the named plaintiffs and the interests of other female students participating in other sports whose interests might not be served by diverting resources to the restoration of the lacrosse team. In vacating and remanding, the Ninth Circuit held that the district court abused its discretion because plaintiffs’ effective accommodation claim did not necessarily require reinstatement of the lacrosse team. It also held that the district court abused its discretion in not independently considering plaintiffs’ equal treatment claim.
Topics:
Athletics & Sports | Gender Equity in AthleticsDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Education Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023—Title IX (Dec. 6, 2023)
U.S. Department of Education Uniform Regulatory Agenda for Fall 2023. The filing indicates that the Department’s Office of Civil Rights plans to issue a final action on Title IX and nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance in March 2024. In a related entry, the Department indicates that it also plans to issue a final rule on Sex-Related Eligibility Criteria for Male and Female Athletic Teams in March 2024.
Topics:
Athletics & Sports | Gender Equity in Athletics | Students | Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.