FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Iowa Individual Health Benefit Reinsurance Ass’n v. State Univ. of Iowa, et al. (Iowa Dec. 29, 2023)
Opinion affirming-in-part, reversing-in-part, and remanding. In 1995, Iowa’s Individual Health Insurance Market Reform Act established the Iowa Individual Health Benefit Reinsurance Association (IIHBRA). The Act required that “all persons that provide health benefit plans in the state” be members of IIHBRA and authorized IIHBRA to assess its members, based on information they provided about premiums and losses, in order to equalize its members’ gains and losses. The University of Iowa, Iowa State University, and the University of Northern Iowa, which provided self-funded health benefit plans for their employees, contended they were not members and declined to pay IIHBRA’s assessments. Following a protracted procedural history, a bench trial awarded damages for unpaid assessments to IIHBRA, and the Universities appealed. In affirming the trial court, the Supreme Court of Iowa held that the Universities’ statutory interpretation that limited IIHBRA membership to entities enumerated as examples in the text is unduly restrictive. It further held that because the assessments were primary obligations of the Universities and did not impose suretyship for other entities, the Act did not violate the Iowa Constitution as applied to the Universities. The court affirmed the denial of attorney fees and costs but reversed and remanded with instructions to award 5% late payment fees to IIHBRA.
Topics:
Employee Benefits | Faculty & Staff | Health Care & Insurance
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.