FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
U.S. Dep.’t of Educ. New Resources on Students with Disabilities (Feb. 20, 2024)
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) New Resources on Students with Disabilities. In a press release, OCR announced four new resources with information for students and institutions to understand their respective rights and obligations regarding common medical conditions that can be disabilities under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The four conditions include asthma, diabetes, food allergies, and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease). The Department also highlighted a compilation of Fast Facts on Students with Disabilities compiled by the National Center for Education Statistics addressing the number of students in postsecondary education who have a disabling condition.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
Bullock v. The Univ. of Tex. at Arlington (5th Cir. Feb. 15, 2024)
Opinion reversing dismissal and remanding for further proceedings. Plaintiff, a student at the University of Texas at Arlington who suffers from major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, brought a disability discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act against the University after a professor declined to apply her approved accommodations retroactively when her accommodation letter was initially sent to the incorrect email address, alleging that this resulted in lower grades for the semester, including one failing grade. Plaintiff originally filed her claim in state court, which dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and the state appellate court affirmed. The federal district court dismissed the claim as time-barred, reasoning that the federal claim was filed more than 60 days after the state trial court dismissed the claim. In reversing and remanding, the Fifth Circuit found that the district court erred in starting the 60-day clock on the date of the trial court’s dismissal rather than 60 days after entry of the state appellate court’s judgement when its plenary power to alter its judgment expired and its judgment became final.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
ACE Amicus Brief in Zhang v. Emory Univ. (Feb. 22, 2024)
Amicus Brief from the American Council on Education (ACE) and 16 other higher education associations in Zhang v. Emory University. Plaintiffs-Appellants, the parents of a 17-year-old student at Emory University who died by suicide, brought negligence claims against the University alleging that it knew or should have known that their son was at risk of suicide. After permitting limited plausibility discovery, the district court granted the University’s motion to dismiss, finding conclusory an allegation that an instructor knew that the student appeared to be suicidal prior to when he passed away. Through this amicus brief, the associations ask the Eleventh Circuit to affirm dismissal and decline to find that a university may be liable “on a negligence-based theory for a student’s suicide where there are no well-pled facts showing that the university had any knowledge that the student was considering suicide or self-harm.” The brief argues that to impose such a duty would be both inconsistent with the expectation held even by students who matriculate before the age of 18 that they be treated as autonomous adults with protected privacy interests and would otherwise hinder the higher education community’s progress in removing stigma associated with seeking mental health care.
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Distressed & Suicidal Students | Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration | Students | Tort LitigationDate:
Fields v. Bd. of Trs. of Ga. Military Coll. (M.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2024)
Order granting-in-part and denying-in-part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, a former assistant professor of natural sciences at the Georgia Military College Augusta campus who was diagnosed with Crohn’s Disease, kidney failure, and anemia and who took immune-suppressing treatments, brought disability discrimination claims against the College after it denied his request to teach remotely and terminated his employment in January 2021. Plaintiff also taught as an adjunct in the College’s Global Online Learning College (GOLC) until 2016 when the Augusta campus director decided that faculty there could no longer teach for GOLC, preferring that they be available to assist students on the Augusta campus. In permitting his Rehabilitation Act claim to proceed, the court held that a reasonable jury could conclude that plaintiff’s request to be reassigned to GOLC was a reasonable accommodation. It also found that since the College never informed Plaintiff that he needed to return to work and because officials offered multiple reasons for his termination, there was a dispute of material fact as to why he was terminated.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & DiversityDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Education RFI on Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Needs in Higher Education (Jan. 26, 2024)
U.S. Department of Education Request for Information (RFI) on Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Needs in Higher Education. The Department seeks “information, research, and suggestions regarding supporting student mental health and/or substance use disorder (behavioral health) needs” including examples of effective practices or supports from State higher education agencies, as well as potential challenges to designing solutions. Comments are due on or before February 25, 2024.
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Distressed & Suicidal StudentsDate:
Thomas v. Coppin State Univ. (D. Md. Jan. 25, 2024)
Memorandum Opinion granting Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, who was in his first year as a tenure-track assistant professor at Coppin State University, brought discrimination and due process claims against the University after he was placed on paid administrative leave and notified that his appointment would not be renewed after the University received multiple allegations of workplace hostility against him. Plaintiff alleged that a dean and colleagues had been dismissive of his back issues and other health concerns and that officials had not provided support when he sought assistance addressing disruptive student behavior in his classroom. In dismissing his hostile work environment claim, the court found plaintiff had alleged insufficient facts to plead a severe or pervasive hostile environment. In dismissing his due process claim, the court noted that he received a notice of nonrenewal rather than a termination and that he failed to establish a property interest in anything beyond his one-year term appointment.
Topics:
Constitutional Issues | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Due ProcessDate:
Daywalker v. UTMB at Galveston (5th Cir. Jan. 9, 2024)
Opinion affirming summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Plaintiff, a former resident at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), brought sex and race discrimination claims and an FMLA retaliation claim against UTMB after she was placed on a remediation program for “lapses in professional behavior” in clinical documentation and timeliness and told she would need to repeat her third year when she returned from a four-month FMLA leave of absence. In affirming summary judgment in favor of UTMB on her failure-to-promote claim, the Fifth Circuit found that (1) plaintiff’s one asserted comparator had no issues with accuracy or timeliness and was not similarly situated and (2) she was unable to overcome the documented concerns of numerous faculty members to establish pretext. It further held that the “handful” of offensive statements, which she alleged were made “over the span of a few years” were insufficient to raise a question of hostile work environment or constructive discharge. In affirming summary judgment on her FMLA retaliation claim, the court found that she was unable to establish causation because the decision that she should repeat her third year was taken between when she requested a “leave of absence” and when her counsel requested that leave be converted to protected FMLA leave. The court also held that the magistrate judge did not err during discovery in ordering the redaction of identifying information from potential comparator evidence because medical residents are also students for the purposes of FERPA.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) | Privacy & Transparency | Race and National Origin Discrimination | Retaliation | Sex Discrimination | Sex Discrimination in EmploymentDate:
Warman v. Mount St. Joseph Univ. (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2024)
Order granting-in-part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, a former nursing student at Mount St. Joseph University who had been diagnosed with multiple disabilities, including depression, anxiety, and brain tumors, brought various civil rights and Fourth Amendment claims under §1983 and disability discrimination claims against the University and multiple officials after he was denied a religious exemption to the University’s COVID-19 vaccination policy. Plaintiff also alleged that campus police had questioned him about his decision not to receive a vaccine. In dismissing plaintiff’s civil rights claims, the court found that the University officials who established the vaccination policy were private persons and employees of a private entity who neither acted in a public function nor exercised state coercive power. It ruled that plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim against the campus police officer failed, finding that no seizure took place because a reasonable person in the circumstances alleged would have believed they were free to leave, and that the officers were, accordingly, entitled to qualified immunity. In dismissing his disability discrimination claim, the court noted that though he had submitted medical documentation indicating “a medical need to avoid taking COVID vaccines,” he had not alleged what condition gave rise to this need. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims.
Topics:
Campus Police, Safety, & Crisis Management | Constitutional Issues | Coronavirus | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Fourth Amendment & Search and SeizureDate:
U.S. Dep.’t of Justice Regulatory Agenda for Spring 2023—Web Accessibility (Dec. 6, 2023)
U.S. Department of Justice Uniform Regulatory Agenda for Fall 2023. The filing indicates that the Department’s Civil Rights Division plans to issue a final action on Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities in April 2024.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Technology | Technology AccessibilityDate:
Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer (U.S. Dec. 5, 2023)
Opinion vacating as moot and remanding to the First Circuit with instructions to dismiss. Respondent, a self-described “tester,” sued Acheson Hotels and hundreds of other hotels because they did not provide information about accessibility of their rooms on their websites as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. To resolve a circuit split, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the question, “Does a self-appointed Americans with Disabilities Act ‘tester’ have Article III standing to challenge a place of public accommodation’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she lacks any intention of visiting that place of public accommodation?” The Court dismissed the case as moot after respondent voluntarily dismissed her pending suits with prejudice following her lawyer’s suspension from the practice of law for lying in fee petitions and during settlement negotiations.
Topics:
Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.