FILTERS
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Diversity in Employment
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Enforcement of Non-Discrimination Laws
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Religious Discrimination & Accommodation
- Retaliation
- Sex Discrimination
- Veterans Discrimination
- Academic Freedom & Employee Speech
- Background Checks & Employee Verification
- Collective Bargaining
- Diversity in Employment
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Discipline & Due Process
- Employee Sexual Misconduct
- Employment of Foreign Nationals
- Employment Separation, RIFs, ERIPs & Retrenchment
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Categorization of Employees
- Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Intellectual Property
- Reproductive Health Issues
- Research
- Retaliation
- Tenure
- Veterans & Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Diversity in the General Counsel’s Office
- Ethical Obligations of Higher Education Lawyers
- Evaluation of Operations & Staff in the General Counsel’s Office
- External Counsel
- Law Office Management
- Law Office Technology
- Law Office Training
- Roles & Responsibilities of the General Counsel
- Wellness & Stress Management
- Academic Performance and Misconduct
- Admissions
- Distressed & Suicidal Students
- Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans
- Hazing
- Internships, Externships, & Clinical Work
- Student Athlete Issues
- Student Conduct
- Student Housing
- Student Organizations
- Student Speech & Campus Unrest
- Title IX & Student Sexual Misconduct
- Uncategorized
Latest Cases & Developments
Date:
Ostrowski v. Ind. Univ. (Ind. App. May 28, 2024)
Memorandum Decision affirming denial of worker’s compensation benefits. Appellant, a former employee of the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University who experienced atrial fibrillation and hip arthritis, filed a work injury claim and a federal Rehabilitation Act claim against the University after she found it too difficult to walk from the closest parking area to the campus building housing the Institute. After the parties settled the federal case, the Worker’s Compensation Board of Indiana affirmed the University’s denial of her work injury claim, finding that her symptoms did not constitute a compensable injury because they were “temporary and could have occurred anywhere.” In affirming the denial, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held that neither the Board’s factual conclusion that the walk on the hilly campus was routine and everyday, nor its legal conclusion that her symptoms were temporary and did not worsen her pre-existing medical conditions were clearly erroneous.
Topics:
Accessible Facilities | Compliance & Risk Management | Disability Discrimination | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Indemnity & InsuranceDate:
GASB Statement on Certain Risk Disclosures (Jan. 8, 2024)
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 102 on Certain Risk Disclosures. This Statement will require government entities to disclose in financial statements concentrations or constraints that may limit their ability to acquire resources or control spending, along with assessments of their vulnerability to a substantial impact and the likelihood that events associated with the concentration or constraints have occurred, begun to occur, or are more likely to occur within 12 months of the financial statement. The requirements of the Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2024, and earlier application is encouraged.
Topics:
Compliance & Risk Management | Compliance Programs, Policies & Procedures | Risk ManagementDate:
Sherman v. Itawamba Cmty. Coll. (N.D. Miss. Aug. 1, 2023)
Memorandum Opinion denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, a former residence hall director and manufacturing extension partnership coordinator at Itawamba Community College, brought retaliation, malicious interference with employment, and whistleblower claims against the College and multiple officials after she was placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP) and then terminated. Plaintiff alleged that her PIP and termination were a result of her report to college officials and the State Auditor of regulatory noncompliance and other violations in the College’s Workforce Training Program. In permitting plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim to proceed, the court found that her reports of wrongdoing to the State were sufficiently outside of her ordinary job duties to demonstrate that she spoke as a citizen. The court also permitted her malicious interference and whistleblower claims to proceed, holding that she had presented sufficient evidence to raise questions of material fact as to whether her termination resulted from her report to the State Auditor.
Topics:
Compliance & Risk Management | Compliance Programs, Policies & Procedures | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | RetaliationDate:
J.L. v. Rockefeller Univ. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 25, 2023)
Decision and Order granting-in-part and denying-in-part Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff alleged that he was sexually assaulted by a doctor employed by Rockefeller University Hospital between 1957 and 1966, when he was between the ages of seven and sixteen, during appointments for physical exams. The court permitted plaintiff to proceed in his negligent hiring, retention, supervision and/or direction claim, finding that he had sufficiently alleged that hospital staff were aware that the doctor was abusing children and that he had taken inappropriate photographs of his victims while they were patients in the hospital. It dismissed his intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims, finding the allegations duplicative of the negligence claims. In dismissed his breach of duty in loco parentis claim, finding that because the hospital did not have long-term custody or supervision of plaintiff, the duty applicable to schools as contemplated in the case law did not apply to the hospital.
Topics:
Compliance & Risk Management | Discrimination, Accommodation, & Diversity | Employee Sexual Misconduct | Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration | Sex Discrimination | Tort Litigation
NACUA Annual Conference
Join us in the Music City June 29 – July 2 to connect, learn, and lead alongside higher education attorneys shaping policy, practice, and impact nationwide together.