FILTERS



Find by DATE
Reset

Latest Cases & Developments


  • Date:

    Education and Workforce Committee Pass the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan (Apr. 29, 2025)

    The Education and Workforce Committee passed the “Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan” with an intent to save over $330 billion by way of reforming postsecondary education through three main initiatives: (1) strengthening accountability for students and taxpayers, (2) streamlining student loan options, and (3) simplifying student loan repayment. Specifically, the bill would require colleges “to have skin in the game” by paying a portion of their students’ unpaid loans based on how much of a return on investment the degree provided. It would set a maximum cap of $50,000 for undergraduate student loans, eliminate the GradPLUS loan for graduate students, and amend the maximum aggregate student loan cap to $100,000 for graduate students and $150,000 for professional students, as well as impose a total cap of $50,000 on Parent PLUS loans, requiring students to borrow the maximum amount they can before their parent takes out a loan on their behalf. Further, the bill repeals the SAVE plan and streamlines other repayment plan options into either a fixed repayment plan or an income-driven repayment plan. In addition, the bill proposes (1) additional funding to reduce funding shortfall for the Pell Grant Program, (2) elimination of the Gainful Employment Rule, (3) establishment of performance-based grants to institutions, (4) allowing student loan rehabilitation twice instead of once, and finally, (5) revises deferment and forbearance terms. In addition to the bill, the Committee has put together a Fact Sheet as well as a section-by-section summary and a preliminary cost estimation sheet. The bill now heads to the Budget Committee before it is considered on the House Floor. 

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Contracts | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | Higher Education Act (HEA) | Students

  • Date:

    ACE Letter Opposing the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan (Apr. 29, 2025)

    The American Council on Education (ACE) sent a letter (the Letter) to Rep. Tim Walberg, Chairman of the Committee on Education and Workforce expressing opposition to the “Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan” – a proposal to provide a budget reconciliation affecting education programs. The Letter states that the bill proposes policies that would harm students, institutions, and borrowers, specifically noting the reduction in student aid to low-income students and onerous financial penalties on institutions, particularly those least able to meet them. It states opposition to proposals including: (1) limiting Pell eligibility; (2) eliminating subsidized student loans; (3) eliminating Grad PLUS and restricting Parent PLUS loans without adequate increases in loan limits; (4) limiting the availability of federal aid to the median cost of specific programs; (5) eliminating/ reducing forbearances and deferments; and (6) establishing less favorable loan repayment options, all of which the Letter avers will lead to students paying more, borrowing more, and facing costlier repayment terms. The Letter critiques the proposal to create an institutional risk-sharing process, framing it as “significantly problematic.” The Letter states that the proposal would unduly penalize the institutions serving the largest number of students operating in the labor market and concludes that “attempting to design and implement an accountability scheme with such an uneven, incredibly complex, and punitive approach will only result in enormous negative consequences.”  

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Contracts | Financial Aid, Scholarships, & Student Loans | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | Higher Education Act (HEA) | Students

  • Date:

    Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy (Apr. 23, 2025)

    Executive Order “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy.” This Order seeks to eliminate disparate-impact liability, defining it as holding that “a near insurmountable presumption of unlawful discrimination exists where there are any differences in outcomes in certain circumstances among different races, sexes, or similar groups, even if there is no facially discriminatory policy or practice or discriminatory intent involved, and even if everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.” The Order also states that disparate-impact liability undermines national values and runs contrary to equal protection under the law and violates the Constitution. The Order seeks to revoke regulations that were promulgated under 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1, including: (1) the Presidential approval of July 25, 1966, of the Department of Justice Title VI regulations (31 Fed. Reg. 10269), as applied to 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(2) in full; and (2)  the Presidential approval of July 5, 1973, of the Department of Justice Title VI regulations (38 Fed. Reg. 17955, FR Doc. 73-13407), as applied to the words “or effect” in both places they appear in 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(3), and as applied to 28 C.F.R. 42.104(b)(6)(ii) and 28 C.F.R. 42.104(c)(2) in full. The Order requires the Attorney General to initiate appropriate action to repeal or amend the implementing regulations for Title VI for all agencies to the extent they contemplate disparate-impact liability, and in coordination with the heads of all other agencies, report to the President all existing regulations, guidance, rules, or orders that impose disparate-impact liability or similar requirements, and detail agency steps for their amendment or repeal, as appropriate under applicable law; and other laws or decisions, including at the State level, that impose disparate impact liability and any appropriate measures to address any constitutional or other legal infirmities. Finally, the Order requires the Attorney General and the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to jointly formulate and issue guidance or technical assistance to employers regarding appropriate methods to promote equal access to employment regardless of whether an applicant has a college education. The White House also issued a Fact Sheet with the Order.

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Higher Education Act (HEA)

  • Date:

    Preparing Americans for High-Paying Skilled Trade Jobs of the Future (Apr. 23, 2025)

    Executive Order “Preparing Americans for High-Paying Skilled Trade Jobs.” This Order seeks to fully equip the American worker to produce world-class products and implement world-leading technologies, as well as consolidate and streamline fragmented Federal workforce development programs “that are too disconnected from propelling workers into secure, well-paying, and high-need American jobs.” The Order requires the Secretaries of Labor, Commerce, and Education to review all Federal workforce development programs within 90 days of the date of the Order and develop a report setting forth strategies to help the American worker. The report must identify opportunities to integrate systems that realign resources to address critical workforce needs and in-demand skills of emerging industries and companies investing in the United States as determined, to the extent permissible by law, by prospective employers, including: administrative reforms to agency policies and programmatic requirements, process improvements to better the experience of program participants, and recommendations to further restructure and consolidate programs; Federal workforce development and education programs or related spending within those programs, that are ineffective or otherwise fail to achieve their desired outcomes; available statutory authorities to promote innovation and system integration in pursuit of better employment and earnings outcomes for program participants; opportunities to invest in the upskilling of incumbent workers to meet rapidly evolving skill demands of their industries, including the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace; strategies to identify alternative credentials and assessments to the four-year college degree that can be mapped to the specific skill needs of prospective employers; and efficiencies to streamline formation collection. Finally, the Order requires the Secretaries of Labor, Commerce, and Education to submit a plan to reach and surpass 1 million new active apprentices within 120 days of the date of the Order. The plan must identify (1) avenues to expand registered apprenticeships to new industries and occupations, including high-growth and emerging sectors; (2) measures to scale this proven model across the country, improve its efficiency, and provide consistent support to program participants; opportunities, including through the Perkins V Act and Federal student aid, to enhance connections between the education system and registered apprenticeships. The White House also issued a Fact Sheet with the Order.

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Higher Education Act (HEA)

  • Date:

    White House Initiative to Promote Excellence and Innovation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (Apr. 23, 2025)

    Executive Order “White House Initiative to Promote Excellence and Innovation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” This Order seeks to support HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges and Universities). The Order establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities led by an Executive Director to be designated by the President. The Initiative has the mission to  increase the private-sector role, including the role of private foundations in strengthening HBCUs; and enhance HBCUs’ capabilities by supporting implementation of the HBCU PARTNERS Act, collaborate with the Department of Agriculture and State governments to establish a framework for addressing barriers to accessing Federal funding to ensure that HBCUs receive the maximum funding to which they may be entitled, collaborate with agencies to improve the competitiveness of HBCUs for other sources of Federal research and development funding; and convene an annual White House Summit on HBCUs to address matters related to the Initiative’s missions and functions. The Order establishes in the Department of Education, the President’s Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (Board). The Board shall include representatives of a variety of sectors, including philanthropy, education, business, finance, entrepreneurship, innovation, and private foundations, and current HBCU presidents. The Department of Education shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board. The Order revokes Executive Order 14041 of September 3, 2021 (White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity Through Historically Black Colleges and Universities) and requires that within 14 days of the date of the order, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall terminate the Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions Advisory Council. The White House also issued a Fact Sheet with the Order. 

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Higher Education Act (HEA)

  • Date:

    Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education (Apr. 23, 2025)

    Executive Order “Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education.” This Order seeks to reform accreditation standards in an effort to improve graduation rates and eliminate DEI (“diversity, equity, and inclusion”) practices amongst accrediting boards. The Order requires the Secretary of Education to hold accrediting agencies accountable through denial, monitoring, suspension, or termination of accreditation recognition. The Order further requires the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education to investigate and take appropriate action to terminate unlawful discrimination by American law schools and medical schools or graduate medical education entities, including unlawful “diversity, equity, and inclusion” requirements under the guise of accreditation standards. The Order requires new principles of student-oriented Accreditation. Under these new principles, the Secretary of Education shall take appropriate steps to ensure that “(i) accreditation requires higher education institutions to provide high-quality, high-value academic programs free from unlawful discrimination or other violations of Federal law; (ii) barriers are reduced that limit institutions from adopting practices that advance credential and degree completion and spur new models of education; (iii) accreditation requires that institutions support and appropriately prioritize intellectual diversity amongst faculty in order to advance academic freedom, intellectual inquiry, and student learning; (iv) accreditors are not using their role under Federal law to encourage or force institution to violate State laws, and (v) accreditors are prohibited from engaging in practices that result in credential inflation that burdens students with additional unnecessary costs.” To advance the policies and objectives within the order, the Secretary of Education shall “(i) resume recognizing new accreditors to increase competition and accountability in promoting high-quality, high-value academic programs focused on student outcomes; (ii) mandate that accreditors require member institutions to use data on program-level student outcomes to improve such outcomes, without reference to race, ethnicity, or sex; (iii) promptly provide to accreditors any noncompliance findings relating to member institutions issued after an investigation conducted by the Office of Civil Rights under Title VI or Title IX; (iv) launch an experimental site, pursuant to Section 487A(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, to accelerate innovation and improve accountability []; (v) increase the consistency, efficiency, and effectiveness of the accreditor recognition review process, including through the use of technology; (vi) streamline the process of higher education institutions to change accreditors to ensure institutions are not forced to comply with standards that are antithetical to institutional values and mission and (vii) update the Accreditation Handbook to ensure that the accreditor recognition and reauthorization process is transparent, efficient, and not unduly burdensome. The White House also issued a Fact Sheet with the Order.

    Topics:

    Accreditation | Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act

  • Date:

    American Association of Colleges and Universities Constructive Engagement Statement (Apr. 22, 2025)

    The American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) organized a statement that has been signed by more than 500 academic leaders denouncing the Trump Administration for what it refers to as “unprecedented government overreach and political interference” and “coercive use of public research funding” in higher education. It states that the “price of abridging the defining freedoms of American higher education will be paid by students and society,” and concludes by calling for constructive engagement that improves institutions and “serves [the] republic.” 

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Higher Education Act (HEA)

  • Date:

    American Educational Research Association v. U.S. Department of Education (D. Md. S.D. Apr. 14, 2025)

    Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. Plaintiffs, the American Educational Research Association and the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness allege that defendants, the U.S. Department of Education (the Department), the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Linda McMahon, and Matthew Soldner exceeded their scope of power when announcing that there would be a mass reduction in force (RIF) at the Department resulting in about 90% of IES personnel being placed on leave. Plaintiffs allege that the Education Science Reform Act of 2002 mandated the establishment of the IES within the Department, and Congress had already appropriated funding to IES for “Special Education Studies and Evaluations,” as well as “Research, Development, and Dissemination.” Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by way of being arbitrary and capricious, preventing IES and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) from carrying out their core functions and disregarding ongoing work and reliance interests. Plaintiffs further allege that defendants’ actions are not in accordance with several laws in violation of 5 U.S.C. §70(2)(A), including the Education Science Reform Act (ESRA), the National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act (NAEPA), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, arguing that the mass terminations are contrary to law, legislative and executive separation of powers, in excess of the Department’s statutory authority, and ultra vires. Plaintiffs ask the court to (1) declare that the IES staff termination action and subsequent notices of termination are arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with law in violation of the APA and violate statutory and constitutional requirements; (2) order defendants to take expeditious steps, no longer than 30 days following the Court’s order, to reinstate the cancelled contracts or, where another contractor could provide equivalent services, to promptly re-bid the contracts, soliciting new contracts to carry out the research and data activities covered by the cancelled contracts; (3) order defendants to take immediate action to prevent the destruction of data in possession of contractors whose contracts were cancelled in the IES research termination action where the data could be subject to deletion requirements or otherwise is at risk of deletion; (4) vacate the IES staff termination action; and (5) order defendants to place individuals designated for termination through the IES staff termination action back in their roles necessary to carry out IES functions. 

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act | Contracts | Grants, Contracts, & Sponsored Research | Higher Education Act (HEA)

  • Date:

    U.S. Department of Education Request for Comments on Accrediting Agencies (Apr. 4, 2025)

    The U.S. Department of Education (the Department) issued a request for comments concerning the performance of accrediting agencies under review by the Secretary of Education. The agencies included in the application for renewal of recognition include: (1) the American Bar Association, Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar; (2) Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools; (3) Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine; (4) American Osteopathic Association, Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation; (5) American Psychological Association, Commission on Accreditation; (6) Commission on Accrediting of the Association of Theological Schools; (7)  Council on Occupational Education; (8) National Nurse Practitioner Residency and Fellowship Training Consortium; (9) Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, Commission on Colleges; and (10) Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools, Accreditation Commission. Written comments must be submitted by May 8, 2025.  

    Topics:

    Accreditation | Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act

  • Date:

    NACUBO On Your Side (Mar. 31, 2025)

    Summary from the National Association of College and University Business Officers on legislative and regulatory actions that occurred March 25-31, 2025. It highlights: the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 1048, the “Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions” (DETERRENT) Act; and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) tentatively decided that entities, other than public business entities, can make a practical expedient accounting policy election.  

    Topics:

    Accreditation, Authorizations, & Higher Education Act